10 Jul 2006

Consultants' letters valued by patients - UCC Study



Patients who received a letter summarising their visit to their medical consultant valued it highly according to a study carried out by researchers at UCC.

The research study focused on the quality of outpatient care, with particular reference to the effectiveness of communications between patients, consultants and referring GPs in the delivery of care.  The study assessed the proposal that consultants in outpatient departments could give patients a letter summarising their consultation, with a copy to their GP.

The study was carried out by the Departments of Epidemiology & Public Health and Applied Social Studies at UCC with collaboration with clinical colleagues in Limerick (Dr Mary Cahill, Consultant Haematologist at Limerick Regional Hospital).

The study had two phases.  In the first phase, the attitudes towards this proposal among patients, GPs and consultants in two health board regions (the HSE - South and HSE Mid-West) were investigated, using quantitative and qualitative methods.  In the second phase, the proposal was evaluated in a randomised controlled trial of 150 patients in an outpatient setting at the Department of Haematology at Limerick Regional Hospital.

The intervention group was provided with a personal letter summarising their outpatient consultation by post within 1-2 days of the consultation.  The letter included reasons for referral, main problems discussed and decisions made in the consultation, follow-up arrangements and diagnosis where available.  Letters were modified in style and language and carefully checked by the consultant for readability.  The letter to the patient was copied to the referring general practitioner. The time taken to dictate each letter was recorded by the consultant.  Control patients received a short note thanking them for attending the clinic with a standard letter to the referring general practitioner.  

The primary outcome measures were patient recall investigating how many patients could recall at least 60% of the items discussed in the intervention and control groups.  The secondary outcome measures were patient and referring clinician satisfaction with the summary letters.

The effect of the personal letters in terms of recall was not significant and was determined more by patients' age and educational status.  However patients reported high satisfaction rates with personal letters, regardless of age, gender and educational status.  A substantial majority (80%) of patients were very pleased to receive a written summary of their consultation.  Reported use of the personal letters was high: 71% of intervention patients reported that they read the letter several times and 61% showed the letter to a family member, mainly a spouse or sibling.

Approximately 75% of patients in the control group indicated that they would like to receive a personal letter from the consultant following their visit to the out-patient department and most felt that such letters should be sent routinely to patients.

The average time it took the consultant to dictate the personal letters was 6.8 minutes.  The substantial majority of referring clinicians rated the summary letter as a 'very useful' or 'useful' method of doctor -patient communications.

The researchers believe that despite the negative findings on the major outcome of patient recall that personal letters are valued and used by the overwhelming majority of patients.  Indeed they suggest that it may be argued that patients have a right to access relevant correspondence in a form accessible to them and the effect of personal letters on satisfaction with the consultation provides adequate justification for the practice.  The study also showed that personal letters mailed directly to patients (with a copy to the referring clinician) are acceptable to the overwhelming majority of referring general practitioners and consultants.

The study was carried out through a HRB health services research fellowship, awarded to Máire O'Reilly of the Department of Epidemiology & Public Health and the Department of Applied Social Studies.

260RMcD

 


 
« Back to 2006 Press Releases