- About
- People
- Our Research
- Current Projects
- CUSTOMISE
- Dissemination
- Implementing Digital Diabetes Prevention programmes to promote patient engagement and scale up
- Improving the implementation and reach of self-management support in Cancer Care
- Optimising practice feedback to improve diabetes care (OPTI AUDIT - GP)
- Completed Projects
- Learning to created integrated community Networks through Knowledge exchange (LINK)
- Enhancing the reach and sustainability of an integrated falls prevention pathway
- Experiences and perceptions of evidence use among senior stakeholders in the HSE - Evidence use in the Irish health service
- End to End (E2E) Implementation of the Model of Integrated Care for Type 2 diabetes
- Experiences of the DAFNE structured education programme, and managing type 1 diabetes during Covid-19
- Translating the tailoring process to improve the implementation of diabetes care.
- Collaborations
- Improving shared decision making in perimenopause consultations in general practice
- Current Projects
- News
- Training and Events
- Patient and Public Involvement
News
New micro costing paper published in Implementation Science
The paper outlines how we retrospectively costed the development of the IDEAs intervention, a multifaceted intervention in primary care to improve attendance at diabetic retinopathy screening.
Most studies that consider the cost of implementation start from the point of a fully designed or selected implementation intervention; few studies report the costs of developing the intervention. Our retrospective micro costing of the IDEAs intervention to support the implementation of diabetic retinopathy screening addresses this gap. We demonstrate how this implementation stage can be costed and offer insight for other researchers when assigning resources to each of the development steps within their own budgets. Our findings highlight the significant opportunity cost associated with the time devoted to development, indicating development costs should be considered as part of the assessment of cost-effective interventions. You can read the full paper here.