In This Section
- Home
- Governance
- Governing Authority
- Membership of Governing Authority
- Committees of Governing Authority
- Schedule of Meetings of Governing Authority
- Reports to Staff of Governing Body Meetings
- Due Dates for Meeting Documentation
- Regulation on Conduct of Governing Authority Business
- Decisions reserved to Governing Authority
- Code of Conduct for Governing Authority Members
- University Governance
- Statutes & Regulations
- University Companies
- Governing Authority
- Legal & Information Compliance
- Enterprise Risk Management
- University Safety Policy
- Training Timetable
- Safety Statements
- Incident Reporting
- Risk Assessment
- Emergencies
- Fieldwork
- Staff Safety Representatives
- Ventilation
- Health and Safety
- About
- Training
- University Safety Policies
- Managing Health & Safety
- Safety Statements
- Risk Assessments
- Occupational Health & Ergonomics
- Fieldwork
- Staff Safety Reps
- Permit to Work
- Other Safety Contacts
- Occupational Hygiene
- Blended Working Risk Assessments
- Research Projects/Lab Adaptations
- Health & Safety Authority Inspections
- Ventilation
- Radiation, Ionising and Non-Ionising
- Health & Safety and Security
- Health & Safety for Student Activity
- Travel
- Incidents & Emergencies
- Policies
- Contact Us
Fraud and Corruption Response Procedure
1 Introduction
The purpose of this procedure is to provide a structured, transparent, and fair process for responding to suspected Fraud or Corruption within the organisation.
Users of this procedure should refer to the Anti Fraud and Corruption Policy available at www.ucc.ie/en/ocla/policy/afcpp/policy.
In summary, allegations are submitted via a form to the Fraud Response Panel (FRP), assessed and investigated where necessary, and reported to the President for decision-making. Findings are shared with the Audit and Risk Committee and Governing Authority, while the Corporate Secretary reports confirmed Fraud and/ or Corruption and remedial actions to external regulators and authorities as appropriate.
2 Reporting Suspected Fraud and/or Corruption
A person who suspects that Fraud or Corruption may be occurring or may have occurred in the past should report it as soon as possible. Fraud and/or Corruption can be detected at any level within the University, and the following should apply in the reporting of suspected Fraud and/or Corruption:
- Employees should normally report concerns to their Head of School/Function or Line Manager, who escalates the matter to the Head of College/Functional Area. The Head of College/ Functional Area then refers it to the Fraud Response Panel (FRP) using the Fraud/Corruption Notification Form.
- If reporting to an immediate superior is not appropriate, the concern may be raised with a more senior manager or directly with the Head of College/Functional Area, who then refers it to the FRP using the Fraud/Corruption Notification Form.
- Where the Head of College/Functional Area is suspected, employees should report directly to the FRP using the Fraud/Corruption Notification Form.
- If a member of the FRP is suspected, the matter should be reported directly to another member of the FRP using the Fraud/Corruption Notification Form.
- Students should report concerns to their Head of School. If it is inappropriate to report to the Head of School, the report should be made to the Head of College who will then report the allegation to a member of the FRP using the Fraud/Corruption Notification Form.
Those making a report should familiarise themselves with the University’s Disclosures Policy: Disclosures Policy | University College Cork. The FRP may investigate allegations of Fraud and/or Corruption which are referred to it under the University’s Disclosure Policy
On receipt of an allegation of suspected Fraud or Corruption, the Head of Internal Audit will convene the Fraud Response Panel (FRP), see section 3 below.
3 Fraud Response Panel
Membership of the Fraud Response Panel (FRP) will include the following together with any person nominated by the Chair either as a substitute for a member of the FRP or as an additional member of the FRP:
- Head of Internal Audit (Chair)
- Corporate Secretary, and
- One of the following depending on the allegation:
- suspected academic Fraud and/or Corruption - the Deputy President and Registrar;
- suspected research Fraud and/or Corruption- the VP Research and Innovation;
- all other types of suspected Fraud and/or Corruption- the Chief Financial Officer.
Figure 1: Membership of the Fraud Response Panel

4 Conflict of Interest
A conflict of interest check will be carried out on Fraud Response Panel members and any others involved in considering an allegation of Fraud or Corruption under this Procedure in accordance with the University’s Conflict of Interest Policy to ensure no conflict of interest exists. This will be documented.
In the event any member of the Fraud Response Panel has a conflict of interest, then the President (or, if the President has a conflict, the Chair of Governing Authority) will appoint an alternative/substitute member.
5 Initial Assessment
The Fraud Response Panel will undertake an initial assessment to gather factual information and reach a view as to whether further action is required. This may involve the following steps:
- Clarifying the basis of the Fraud and/or Corruption allegation and establishing whether there is evidence that a Fraud and/or Corruption may be occurring or have occurred.
- Reviewing all documentation and information available and taking immediate steps to prevent the possible destruction of relevant information or evidence.
- Determining whether the allegation falls under the Anti Fraud and Corruption Policy or should be dealt with through a different University policy or procedure such as the procedures governing alleged academic and research misconduct.
- Gauging the risk associated with the Fraud and/or Corruption and recommending immediate action if the Fraud and/or Corruption is ongoing, involves a serious loss, or danger to others.
The FRP may seek the advice of external experts.
Each case will be considered individually, in accordance with any expert advice obtained, with a view to minimising the losses (both monetary and otherwise) to the University.
Where the initial assessment provides reasonable grounds for suspecting a member or members of staff or the student body of Fraud or Corruption, the FRP, in consultation with the relevant University Officers, will decide if any actions are necessary to prevent future loss and/or further investigation under this Policy or another University Statute, Policy or Rules.
This may include, in consultation with the Chief People and Culture Officer and/or the Deputy President and Registrar, the temporary suspension of staff or student(s) (in accordance with the Principal Statute or Student Rules) pending further investigation.
6 Procedure for Further Investigation
When further investigation is required under this Policy, the FRP will be responsible for considering all aspects of the case. It will:
- Identify the risks involved in the allegation of Fraud and/or Corruption,
- Agree terms of reference for the investigation. The terms of reference should include expertise required, timing and duration of the investigation and reporting structure.
- Develop an action plan to address the next steps. These may include liaison with the Garda Siochana as well as steps to recover assets, liaison with banks, legal advisors, insurers or others as appropriate in the circumstances.
In circumstances where the investigation requires the use of technical expertise or staff resources not available in the FRP, the FRP may appoint external specialists to lead and/or contribute to the investigation.
Members of the FRP will meet at regular intervals to share information and consider progress and further actions.
The FRP meetings will be treated as confidential and will be fully documented by the Head of Internal Audit as Chair.
The Corporate Secretary (in consultation with the FRP) will be responsible for complying with all legal and regulatory reporting requirements for the University, e.g. Data Commissioner, Charity Regulator, HEA etc.
The principles of natural justice and fair procedures will apply in respect of any member of the University who is requested to cooperate with any investigation. Staff/students who are involved in an investigation will be entitled to have a member of University staff or other appropriate individual present during the course of any interview that is conducted in connection with the alleged Fraud or Corruption with a view to supporting the staff/student. If any person who is required to cooperate with the investigation fails to do so, the FRP may refer this to the Chief People and Culture Officer, Deputy President and Registrar or other appropriate person.
7 Reporting and Lessons Learned
Upon completion of its work, the FRP will submit a written report to the President which will include the following:
- Description of the alleged Fraud/Corruption
- Investigation Terms of Reference (if any)
- Findings/outcome
- Recommendations to prevent a similar Fraud/Corruption re-occuring (if any)
- Any other relevant information
On receipt of the FRP’s written report, the President, in consultation with relevant University Officers, will make a decision on actions to be taken (e.g. whether internal disciplinary procedures should be invoked and the Gardaí and others should be notified as appropriate).
The Head of Internal Audit will submit a copy of the Fraud Response Panel’s report to the Audit and Risk Committee and via the Audit and Risk Committee to the Governing Authority for noting.
The Audit and Risk Committee will, at an appropriate time, consider the recommendations (if any) listed in the FRP’s final report and whether they have been implemented, as appropriate.
The Corporate Secretary and the Director of Media and Communications will be responsible for dealing with any enquiries from the press and other media.
The Corporate Secretary will report as appropriate and in a timely fashion to the HEA the confirmed Fraud indicating what steps have been taken to address the weaknesses in the systems of internal control related to the Fraud. They will also report to the Charities Regulator as appropriate and, on the advice of the Fraud Response panel, An Garda Síochána.
Figure 2: Fraud Response Panel: Investigative Procedure

