In UCC, research ethics are the responsibility of the University Ethics Committee (UEC). The UEC is a committee of Academic Council and it reports annually both to Academic Council and to Governing Body.
The chair of UEC is Dr. Elizabeth Kiely of the School of Applied Social Studies.
UEC has the following key responsibilities
To develop policy and procedures governing ethics in research and research conduct
To make recommendations to Academic Council to ensure the effective operation of ethics governance structures at UCC
To establish and oversee ethics sub-committees
To co-ordinate training and raise awareness of ethics and good research conduct among staff and students.
Please note that UEC does NOT process individual research proposals for ethical approval. This responsibility currently falls to three Research Ethics Committees. The nature of the research proposal (whether focused on animal research, clinical research or social research) determines the appropriate Committee (see below).
Please click on the title for a full copy of the Introduction to Research Ethics at UCC. This provides an introduction to the ethics committees which operate in UCC and their reporting structure. A guide is included to help identify the appropriate committee to which applications for ethical approval should be submitted (Page 19).
Click on the title to access the UCC Code of Research Conduct V2.2
Which ethics committee should you contact?
Researchers are required to submit research proposals to the Committee most relevant to their research methodology.
For ethics support queries, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org
If the research project is clinical in nature, then it must be referred to the Research Ethics Committee of the Cork Teaching Hospitals (CREC).
The requirements of CREC are set out in the Committee’s manual which is freely available from the secretariat (email@example.com). In broad terms, prior approval is necessary where the research methodology involves:
- therapeutic interaction with a human participant
- a clinical trial of, inter alia, a medical device, medicinal product or clinical technique as stipulated under relevant legislation
- development of diagnostic techniques using human participants
- access to, or utilisation of, human tissue and body fluids
- access to, or utilisation of, identifiable medical data concerning individuals (such as clinical records) by parties not directly concerned in the provision of care to these individuals
- interaction with / observation of individuals in a healthcare contact or setting
Non-clinical research which involves human participants comes within the remit of the Social Research Ethics Committee (SREC). Ethical review by SREC is strongly recommended where the methodology is not clinical or therapeutic in nature and proposes to involve:
- direct interaction with human participants for the purpose of data collection using research methods such as questionnaires, interviews, observations, focus groups etc
- indirect observation with human participant for example using observation, web surveys etc
- access to, or utilisation of, data concerning identifiable individuals.
Please Note: If a research protocol falls into both the jurisdictions of CREC and SREC, then the application will usually be referred to CREC. This is to safeguard the proportionality of clinical risk versus therapeutic benefit.
Please click the below link to watch a video of a Lunctime Talk and Presentation on the SREC Application process delivered by the Chair of SREC on 17 May 2017
It contains useful information on the application process along with some of the common errors that are found in SREC applications https://ucc.hosted.panopto.com/Panopto/Pages/Viewer.aspx?id=efa40876-fb18-42c0-86fa-b3503a965189
- To help you submit an application that is properly completed and ready to be logged for review, please read and follow the guidelines in our newly updated Guidance Document for SREC Applicants
- Please complete the application form (link below) and associated documents, and send as one pdf document by email (to: firstname.lastname@example.org).
- Please ensure that your application is signed by the applicant and, if under academic supervision, their supervisor.
- Sample informed consent form templates are provided (links below), to assist applicants with formulating an informed consent form appropriate to the applicant's research project.
- On receipt, properly completed applications will be forwarded to the committee for review and applicants will be forwarded a SREC Log number. Incomplete applications will be returned to applicants to be fully completed before they are logged and forwarded to reviewers.
- Please ensure that you give yourself a good lead time in applying for ethical approval. Once applications are logged for review applicants should expect to have feedback from SREC within 2 to 4 weeks with a decision within 6 to 10 weeks.
- Please consider the University's policy on Research Conduct, see UCC Code of Research Conduct V2.2 , when completing the application, particularly the section pertaining to data management (note: the University expects data to be securely held for a period of ten years after the completion of a research project).
Please Note: SREC's remit pertains to the oversight of staff and post-graduate research. It does not accept undergraduate applications, unless in exceptional circumstances. Undergraduate applications should be reviewed locally (by the relevant College / Department / School). However SREC will consider undergraduate applications where there is a rationale, which precludes them from being reviewed locally.
Any research which involves experimentation on animal subjects must be approved by the Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee (AEEC). This is in addition to obtaining the necessary licences for animal experimentation as prescribed by law. If seeking to apply or renew an animal experimentation licence, the researcher must first refer to the AEEC.