Of course it's just a tree.  What does it look like ?
RDG online
Restitution Discussion Group Archives
  
 
 

Restitution
front page

What's new?

Another tree!

Archive front page

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2007

2006

2008

2009

Another tree!

 
<== Previous message       Back to index       Next message ==>
Sender:
David Cheifetz
Date:
Tue, 10 Apr 2007 02:23:11 -0400
Re:
Supreme Court of Canada - THE COURT - www.thecourt.ca

 

Dear Colleagues:

As some of you know, Osgoode Hall Law School (York University, Toronto, Canada) has started a 'blawg' called THE COURT - www.thecourt.ca - whose logo includes the stated intention that "THE COURT is the online resource for debate & data about the Supreme Court of Canada.*"

In passing, the asterisk in the quotation is part of THE COURT's logo. It links to the caveat at the bottom of the main page: "This website is not authorized by the Supreme Court of Canada". I find it intriguing that we don't see a disclaimer to that effect on SCOTUSBLOG whose title includes the description SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES BLOG, in capital letters. I'm not sure what it means that the SCC powers that be thought it necessary to have THE COURT put that disclaimer on its site, whereas the SCOTUS powers that be didn't for SCOTUSBLOG, even though SCOTUSBLOG, explicitly on its home page, advertises for its law firm sponsor: "brought to you by". I'm sure it means something. I'll leave it at that.

Anyway, my point is that I'd like to see THE COURT become what it hopes to become. So, I ask those of you who think you might have something useful to say, in that forum, over the next few months and in the future, to think about saying it there, too.

  

Thanks,

_______________

David Cheifetz
Partner
Bennett Best Burn LLP
Toronto, Canada


<== Previous message       Back to index       Next message ==>

" These messages are all © their authors. Nothing in them constitutes legal advice, to anyone, on any topic, least of all Restitution. Be warned that very few propositions in Restitution command universal agreement, and certainly not this one. Have a nice day! "


     
Webspace provided by UCC   »
»
»
»
»
For editorial policy, see here.
For the unedited archive, see here.
The archive editor is Steve Hedley.
only search restitution site

 
 Contact the webmaster !