Thu, 15 Apr 2004 09:46:22 -0400
v. Stevenson? :-)
15 Apr 2004, at 8:46, Jason Neyers wrote:
Does anyone know of a leading Commonwealth case (HL, SCC, CA,
HCA, PC, etc.) that explicitly rejected the notion that liability
for defective products should be strict or which states explicitly
that strict liability is not the default common law position?
Previous Message ~ Index ~ Next