University College Cork has a policy of Equality of Opportunity and is committed to working towards creating a work and study environment which is free of sexism and sexual harassment. The use of non-sexist, gender-neutral language is an essential part of this policy.
Sexism is discrimination on the basis of gender. While it is primarily women who are affected by sexism, it can be used to discriminate against either men or women.
The language we use reflects and reinforces the values of the society
in which we live. The English language has developed in a male-dominated,
male-centred society. If you examine carefully how we usually express
ourselves you will see how male-centred our language is.
Our languagevery often renderswomen invisible |
The use of sexist language is often unconscious and unintentional but nonetheless damaging. This leaflet aims to draw our attention to the sexist nature of our language and to provide suggestions on ways in which we can change it.
The conscious choice by all of us, staff and students alike, to use
non-sexist, gender-neutral language will greatly assist in the creation
of a more open and equitable environment in UCC.
|
|
Today 'man' is used sometimes to refer solely to male humans, while at other times it is intended to include all human beings. Which meaning is intended is often unclear. Wheher the intention, the use of 'man' obscures the presence and contribution of women.
When we use 'man' it conjures up images of male persons only, not females
or males and females together.
| Instead of | Try |
| Man is a species who suckles his young
|
Humans are a species who suckle their young |
| The man we want for the job | The person we want for the job |
| The man on the street | The average person
The ordinary person People in general |
| Manning the office | Staffing the office |
|
|
| Change to the plural form
|
|
| Each student must complete his
assessment by Friday |
Students must complete their
assessments by Friday |
| The lecturer will display his timetable
on his office door |
Lecturers will display their timetables
on their office doors |
| Anyone who wants his work evaluated...
|
Those who want their work evaluated...
|
| Change to the passive form
|
|
| He must return it by the due date
|
It must be returned by the due date
|
| Use indefinite pronouns and articles:
|
e.g. one, each, anyone, nobody, somebody, someone |
| A student who wants his essay returned...
|
Anyone who wants an essay returned...
|
| Anyone wanting essays returned... |
|
|
Many common expressions and sayings are phrased exclusively in male
terms, thus excluding women. Re-phrasing them in gender-neutral terms
will help make them more inclusive, without changing the essential wisdom
of the saying.
| Instead of
|
Try
|
| Everything comes to him who waits
|
Everything comes to those who wait
|
| To each his own
|
To each one's own
|
| One man's meat is another man's poison
|
What is food to one is poison to another
|
| Time waits for no man | Time waits for no one |
|
|
| Instead of | Try |
| Miss, Mrs | Ms |
| Instead of
|
Try
|
| Professor J. Collins and
Professor Mary Murphy |
Professor John Collins and
Professor Mary Murphy or |
| Professor J. Collins and
Professor M. Murphy |
|
| Contact Dr. Barry or his secretary, Jane
|
Contact Dr. Barry or Ms. Kelly, Secretary
|
| Dr. O'Neill, Eileen Ryan
and Paddy Walsh |
Dr. O'Neill, Ms. Ryan
and Mr. Walsh |
Men rarely address other men as love, pet or dear, but frequently do so to women. Essentially, they are treating women differently from how they treat men. This could be interpreted as alack of respect or that the relationship is viewed as potentially sexual. Whatever the reason, it is inappropriate in work and study relationships.
When people in positions of authority refer to others as love, pet or dear, it can be felt to be patronising and dismissive. If we are to treat those with whom we study and work with respect as equals, we should try to avoid the use of overly-familiar terms of address.
|
|
| Instead of
|
Try
|
| Maintenance men
|
Maintenance staff
|
| Cleaning woman/women
|
Cleaner/cleaning staff
|
| Instead of
|
Try
|
| Female electrician, woman doctor,
female poet, male nurse |
Electrician, doctor,
poet, nurse |
| Instead of
|
Try
|
| Poetess, actress, usherette
|
Poet, actor, usher
|
| Stewardess, steward, air hostess | Flight attendant |
|
|
| Instead of
|
Try
|
| Lecturers and their wives
are invited to attend |
Lecturers and their partners
are invited to attend |
|
|
| Instead of
|
Try
|
| The girls in the office
|
The secretaries/typists/
administrative assistants |
| Two men and three girls
work in that lab |
Five people work in that lab
or
|
| Two men and three women work in that lab |
|
|
| Instead of
|
Try
|
| She's a tomboy
|
She's an adventurous/daring girl
|
| He's a sissy
|
He's a sensitive/caring boy
|
| Instead of
|
Try
|
| She's very masculine
|
She is a strong/independent/
assertive woman |
| What is needed is the
feminine touch |
What is needed is a caring/
considerate attitude |
| Instead of
|
Sometimes try
|
| If Tom had 5 apples... | If Mary had 5 apples... |
Personification of inanimate objects arises from stereotyped notions of male and female characteristics. Objects which are strong or powerful are generally personified as male, while thse which are weak, passive or receptive are personified as female. Thus the sun is seen to be male while the moon (which receives light from the sun) is seen to be female.
In common usage vehicles and mechanised objects are often personified
and more objects tend to be personified as female than male. Typically
objects which are containers, e.g. ships, are personified as female.
Since objects do not have gender, it is more appropriate to refer to them
as 'it'.
| Instead of
|
Try
|
| The ship set forth with her
sail billowing in the wind |
The ship set forth with its
sail billowing in the wind |
| That car is hard to start
but just give her a shove and she's up and running |
That car is hard to start
but just give it a shove and it's up and running |
|
|
When listing pairs of nouns and pronouns, we usually put the male before
the female. This suggests a hierarchy of importance and status.
Varying the word order can help to challenge this.
| Instead of
|
Try
|
| Men and Women
|
Women and Men
|
| Boys and Girls
|
Girls and Boys
|
| Husbands and Wives
|
Wives and Husbands
|
| Fathers and Mothers
|
Mothers and Fathers
|
| Sir or Madam | Madam or Sir |
|
|
| INSTEAD OF...
|
YOU COULD USE...
|
| a male secretary
|
a secretary
|
| a woman professor, doctor
|
a professor, doctor
|
| barman, barmaid
|
bar person, bar staff
|
| businessman
|
executive, business executive
|
| chairman
|
chairperson, chair, facilitator, convenor, co-ordinator
|
| clergyman
|
clergy, members of the clergy
|
| craftsman
|
craftsperson, artisan
|
| delivery man
|
deliverer, delivery clerk, courier
|
| draughtsman
|
draughter
|
| fireman
|
fire-fighter
|
| fisherman, fishermen
|
fisher, fishing people
|
| foreman
|
foreperson
|
| founding fathers
|
founders, ancestors
|
| gentleman's agreement
|
unwritten agreement,
agreement based on trust |
| housewife, househusband
|
homemaker
|
| lady
|
woman
|
| laymen
|
lay people, laity
|
| man, to (the office, stand, etc.)
|
to staff, work, serve at (on),
operate, attend, direct |
| man of letters
|
writer, intellectual, scholar, author
|
| man of science
|
scientist, biologist, chemist, etc.
|
| man on the street, ordinary man
|
ordinary person, average person,
people in general |
| man-day
|
work-day
|
| man-hour
|
work-hour
|
| man
|
person
|
| mankind
|
humanity, human beings, humankind,
people, human race |
| manmade
|
synthetic, artificial
|
| manning levels
|
staffing levels
|
| manpower
|
personnel, staff, workforce,
available workers, human resources |
| Miss, Mrs
|
Ms
|
| one-man (operation, show)
|
one-person (operation, show)
|
| maintenance man
|
maintenance staff
|
| spokesman
|
spokesperson, representative
|
| stone age man
|
stone age people
|
| the girls in the office
|
the secretaries, office assistants, typists
|
| tradesman
|
tradesperson
|
| workman
|
worker
|
| workmanship | quality of work, work skill |
|
|
This leaflet has primarily focused on the question of sexism in our language. However, the principles which apply in countering sexism, also apply to countering bias on the basis of race, religion, sexual orientation, age, physical ability, class, etc. We need to make a conscious decision to try to elliminate offensive and derogatory language and to make our language inclusive of all people.
|
|
In June 1989 the Governing Body of University College Cork adopted a statement of policy as follows:
The UCC Committee on Equality of Opportunity was established in 1990 to "advise on the formulation, implementation and monitoring of a programme of positive action in pursuit of equality of opportunity within the College, and to make an annual report to the Governing Body."
The members of the 1993/94 Committee on Equality of Opportunity are:
| Ms. Siobhan Connolly
Students' Union Rights Officer |
Dr. Maeve Conrick
Ombudsman |
| Mr. Donal Coughlan
Director of Personnel and General Services/ Equality Manager |
Mr. Michael Dunne
Services Supervisor |
| Ms. Aveen Henry
Cleaner Production Promotion Unit |
Prof. Maire Mulcahy (Chair)
Vice-President |
| Ms. Pat McNamee
Disabled Student Support Officer |
Mr. Pat O' Connor
Dental Hospital |
| Ms. Anne Skally
Ecams/Records Officer |
Prof. Willie Smyth
Geography Department |
| Ms. Yvonne Willis
Students' Union Vice-President |
Equality Committee Research Officer: Ms. Orla Egan
Administrative Assistant: Ms. Bridie Hartnett
|
|
We have referred to various publications in the course of producing this leaflet. The following have been particularly useful:
Miller, Casey and Kate Swift, The Handbook of Non-Sexist Writing, The Women's Press, 1981, London.
Guidelines on Gender-Free Language and Language Use for Minority Groups in Equal Opportunities into Practice, Lee Taylor (ed.); CVCP, 1992.
Mills, Sara and Sally Robertson, Gender-Free Language, Guidelines for the use of students and staff, University of Strathclyde.
Straton, J., and M. Tonkinson, Achieving Non-Discriminatory Language, A Guide, University of Western Australia, 1990.
The cartoons reprinted on pages 1,5,6, are from The Handbook of Non-Sexist Writing, Casey Miller and Kate Swift (eds.), The Women's Press, 1981.
The cartoon on page 11 is from A Decade of Progress, INTO Handbook on Gender Equality in Primary Education.